FAMILY PLANNING POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Syllabus
Course Learning Objectives
Upon successfully completing this course, students will be able to:
- characterize different contraceptive technologies in terms of their service delivery requirements and their appropriateness for different stages in the reproductive cycle
- compute the Bongaarts intermediate fertility variables and assess how they relate to the level of fertility observed in a population
- analyze contraceptive technologies and service delivery programs from a user perspective
- specify key elements that characterize a high quality service delivery program
- evaluate the role of incentives and disincentives in a family planning program
- discuss the pros and cons of integrated versus vertical family planning and reproductive health service delivery programs
- explain the rationale for cost-recovery in family planning and the observed relationships between price and use of contraceptives
- assess the roles of the private sector and social marketing in a family planning program strategy
- formulate a multifaceted program strategy designed to effectively address that segment of the population with an unmet need for contraception
- critique the ethical issues and human rights concerns that are raised by family planning programs
Introduces issues and programmatic strategies related to the development, organization, and management of family planning programs, especially those in developing countries. Topics include social, economic, health, and human rights rationale for family planning; identifying and measuring populations in need of family planning services; social, cultural, political, and ethical barriers; contraceptive methods and their programmatic requirements; strategic alternatives, including integrated and vertical programs and public and private sector services; information, education, and communication strategies; management information systems; and the use of computer models for program design.
Methods of Assessment
Grading Policy: Student evaluation based on exercise set and a paper.
Grading Restrictions: Letter grade
Academic Ethics Code
The code, discussed in the Policy and Procedure Memorandum for Students, March 31, 2002, will be adhered to in this class:
Students enrolled in the Bloomberg School of Public Health of The Johns Hopkins University assume an obligation to conduct themselves in a manner appropriate to the University's mission as an institution of higher education. A student is obligated to refrain from acts which he or she knows, or under the circumstances has reason to know, impair the academic integrity of the University. Violations of academic integrity include, but are not limited to: cheating; plagiarism; knowingly furnishing false information to any agent of the University for inclusion in the academic record; violation of the rights and welfare of animal or human subjects in research; and misconduct as a member of either School or University committees or recognized groups or organizations.
Disability Support Services
If you are a student with a documented disability who requires an academic accommodation, please contact Betty H. Addison in the Office of Student Life Services: email@example.com, 410-955-3034, or 2017 E. Monument Street.